Qal Imperfect — Geminate (Ayin-Doubled) Paradigms

Full inflection tables for geminate (II=III) roots in the Qal Imperfect.
Both the "short" (qamets prefix + holem) and "long" (hireq prefix + dagesh forte) patterns appear.


Geminate: סָבַב (go around, surround) — Imperfect

Geminate verbs often show two alternate forms in the Imperfect — a "short-looking" form with
qamets prefix (similar to biconsonantal) and a "long" form with dagesh forte in the doubled root:

Person Form A (qamets prefix) Form B (dagesh) Notes
3ms יָסֹב יִסֹּב Both attested; qamets prefix is more common
3fs תָּסֹב תִּסֹּב
2ms תָּסֹב תִּסֹּב
3mp יָסֹ֫בּוּ יִסֹ֫בּוּ Dagesh forte in ב even before -וּ
1cp נָסֹב נִסֹּב
Wayyiqtol 3ms וַיָּ֫סׇּב Form A; qamets prefix + dagesh forte

Geminate: תָּמַם (be complete, finished) — Imperfect

Person Form Notes
3ms יִתְמֹּם Hireq prefix + dagesh forte in מ (R2=R3); holem
3fs תִּתְמֹּם
2ms תִּתְמֹּם
3mp יִתְמְּמוּ Dagesh in מ; shewa before -וּ
Wayyiqtol 3ms וַיִּתְמֹּם Hireq prefix form

Geminate vs. Biconsonantal — Extended Comparison

Feature Geminate (יָסֹב) Biconsonantal (יָקוּם)
3ms form Short: יָסֹב (holem, no long vowel) Long: יָקוּם (shureq as middle vowel)
Wayyiqtol וַיָּ֫סׇּב (dagesh forte in ב) וַיָּ֫קׇם (no dagesh in root)
3mp יָסֹ֫בּוּ (dagesh) יָקֻ֫מוּ (qibbuts, no dagesh)
Root structure R2 = R3 R2 = vowel letter (ו/י)
How to distinguish Two identical root consonants visible No R2 consonant; long vocalic element

Root knowledge is required to distinguish these two classes when both show qamets prefix.
Ask: does the root have two identical final consonants (geminate) or a long middle vowel letter
(biconsonantal)? Once you know the root, the class is clear.


Strong Paradigm — Comparison

Person Strong (יִקְטֹל) Geminate (יָסֹב) Geminate (יִסֹּב) Biconsonantal (יָקוּם)
3ms יִקְטֹל יָסֹב יִסֹּב יָקוּם
3fs תִּקְטֹל תָּסֹב תִּסֹּב תָּקוּם
2ms תִּקְטֹל תָּסֹב תִּסֹּב תָּקוּם
3mp יִקְטְלוּ יָסֹ֫בּוּ יִסֹ֫בּוּ יָקֻ֫מוּ
Wayyiqtol 3ms וַיִּקְטֹל וַיָּ֫סׇּב וַיָּ֫קׇם